Redbaiter
2003-11-14 08:50:45 UTC
George Bush has attracted a lot of attention from the rabid
left.
Why is that?
Why do the socialists worldwide, in New Zealand, Australia, the
UK and the rest of Europe, hate George Bush with such intensity?
Its not just the Iraqi war, which is basically being used by the
socialists as a weapon to attack Bush. The real reason for their
hatred of George Bush is that he is on to their game.
George Bush knows what the socialists are really up to, and he
stands between them and their lifelong goal. The intent of
odious scum like Steve Withers and other examples of humanity's
worst lowlife, is world government by the United Nations.
This is the objective of the world wide group called Socialist
International. Helen Klark is a senior official in this group,
along with every damn free loading stealing slimy socialist
leader involved in government in any country. She's even been to
conferences of this organisation with Parekura Horimia. She is
the head of its International Propaganda Committee, or some such
like named unit.
Now, Socialist International have, in a recent release, exposed
their agenda, which is government of the world by a
"socialised" United Nations. The important issue here is that
finally, the leftists have exposed their agenda of taking over
the United Nations and using it to further their objective of a
world controlled by Socialists.
Think about that folks. Steve Withers and his ilk running the
world. Makes a great mental image doesn't it?
The following article might be a bit long for usenet, but I
haven't snipped it because it is full of very good information.
Read it, and you will know and understand what the Bush haters
really want.
And you will also know and understand where Helen Klark and
Margaret Wilson want New Zealand to end up.
-------------------------------------------------
Concluding its 22nd global congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil,
recently, Socialist International issued its Declaration calling
for implementation of "global governance," in a program that
mirrors the recommendations of the U.N.-funded Commission on
Global Governance, published in 1995.
The International Socialists call for: expanding the U.N.
Security Council; creating a new Economic Security Council;
creating a new World Environmental Organization; and the
mechanisms necessary to enforce "Sustainable Development"
worldwide.
This document makes public the close union between the agenda of
International Socialists and the agenda for global governance
developed by the United Nations. Previous efforts to keep the
"socialist" label away from the U.N., have now been abandoned,
and both institutions are publicly seeking total global
governance through the United Nations.
Though the document does not mention the Bush administration by
name, it decries obstacles to the new world order, sought by the
socialists. Article Three of the Declaration says:
Neoconservatives are attempting to ... dismantle all forms of
global governance, to minimize the role of the United Nations,
to undermine multilateral institutions, to promote unilateralism
and the consecration of the market, and to impose the will of
the powerful to decide the future of mankind.
The president of Socialist International, Antonio Guterres,
former socialist prime minister of Portugal, said the "Bush
administration was impeding efforts to establish a new world
order," according to the Denver Post (Oct. 30, p. 21A).
Specifically, the socialists want the new Economic Security
Council to be a "Council for Sustainable Development that
would coordinate sustainable development on a global scale ..."
and, to implement the Kyoto Protocol.
Socialists want to consolidate the U.N. Environment Program, and
all the existing environmental treaties, under the enforcement
authority of a new World Environment Organization, the same
function the Commission on Global Governance proposed for the
outdated U.N. Trusteeship Council.
This document also endorses: the U.N. Millennium Development
goals adopted in 2000; the U.N.'s Monterey Consensus, adopted in
2002; and the U.N.'s Plan for Sustainable Development, adopted
in Johannesburg in 2002. It calls for the elimination of
agricultural subsidies in the U.S., Europe and Japan, and free
exportation by developing countries into these markets, and
international control of " ... regulation, accountability and
supervision of financial systems to enhance the prospects for
sustainable growth and development."
Socialist International links "exacerbated nationalism ... and
xenophobic attitudes," with terrorism, as "threats to peace,"
which must be addressed only by an expanded U.N. Security
Council, with the authority and means "to act to preserve and
enforce peace," which "must be carried out in accordance with
the decisions of the United Nations."
The [Socialist] International, therefore, believes that reform
of the United Nations cannot be delayed any longer and will
continue to be strongly engaged in the process. Achieving
lasting peace and security requires that the United Nations
Charter be updated to meet today's new challenges, and that the
Security Council be reformed to make it more representative,
democratic and responsive.
The "reform" called for by the U.N.'s Commission on Global
Governance, and by the U.N., would expand the Security Council
in number, whose members would serve rotating terms, remove the
"Permanent Member" status from the U.S., France, England,
Germany and China, and would eliminate the veto power of any
single nation.
The socialists want the U.N. to place "greater emphasis on the
provision of global public services, especially with regard to
sanitation, health care, child-care facilities, education,
employment promotion and environmental protection."
In a clear statement of support for the socialist model of
economic organization, rather than the capitalist model, the
document says:
The principle of public service cannot be sacrificed to the
consecration of the market. Tax systems should also be adapted
to promote better public services and a new global tax should be
created to fund the global public goods.
The "new global tax" endorsed by this statement is discussed at
length throughout U.N. literature and is a series of taxing
proposals ranging from a tax on international currency
transactions (the Tobin Tax), to a tax on resource use, and use
of the "global commons," which includes the air, space, oceans
and the airwaves used for radio, television and Internet
transmissions.
This global taxing authority was included in the first draft of
the recommendations of the U.N.'s High Level Panel on Financing
Development, meeting in Monterey, Mexico, in 2001. It was
removed, at the insistence of the new U.S. delegates, appointed
by the Bush administration. The panel remains in place, however,
to seek independent financing of U.N. operations.
Socialist International is the world's largest political
organization, according to its website, working through more
than 140 national organizations. Its largest affiliate in the
United States is the Democratic Socialists of America, which
says it is "building progressive movements for social change
while establishing an openly socialist presence in American
communities and politics."
The "social change" described here is the global governance
agenda developed jointly, and now publicly advanced by both the
United Nations, and the Socialist International.
left.
Why is that?
Why do the socialists worldwide, in New Zealand, Australia, the
UK and the rest of Europe, hate George Bush with such intensity?
Its not just the Iraqi war, which is basically being used by the
socialists as a weapon to attack Bush. The real reason for their
hatred of George Bush is that he is on to their game.
George Bush knows what the socialists are really up to, and he
stands between them and their lifelong goal. The intent of
odious scum like Steve Withers and other examples of humanity's
worst lowlife, is world government by the United Nations.
This is the objective of the world wide group called Socialist
International. Helen Klark is a senior official in this group,
along with every damn free loading stealing slimy socialist
leader involved in government in any country. She's even been to
conferences of this organisation with Parekura Horimia. She is
the head of its International Propaganda Committee, or some such
like named unit.
Now, Socialist International have, in a recent release, exposed
their agenda, which is government of the world by a
"socialised" United Nations. The important issue here is that
finally, the leftists have exposed their agenda of taking over
the United Nations and using it to further their objective of a
world controlled by Socialists.
Think about that folks. Steve Withers and his ilk running the
world. Makes a great mental image doesn't it?
The following article might be a bit long for usenet, but I
haven't snipped it because it is full of very good information.
Read it, and you will know and understand what the Bush haters
really want.
And you will also know and understand where Helen Klark and
Margaret Wilson want New Zealand to end up.
-------------------------------------------------
Concluding its 22nd global congress in Sao Paulo, Brazil,
recently, Socialist International issued its Declaration calling
for implementation of "global governance," in a program that
mirrors the recommendations of the U.N.-funded Commission on
Global Governance, published in 1995.
The International Socialists call for: expanding the U.N.
Security Council; creating a new Economic Security Council;
creating a new World Environmental Organization; and the
mechanisms necessary to enforce "Sustainable Development"
worldwide.
This document makes public the close union between the agenda of
International Socialists and the agenda for global governance
developed by the United Nations. Previous efforts to keep the
"socialist" label away from the U.N., have now been abandoned,
and both institutions are publicly seeking total global
governance through the United Nations.
Though the document does not mention the Bush administration by
name, it decries obstacles to the new world order, sought by the
socialists. Article Three of the Declaration says:
Neoconservatives are attempting to ... dismantle all forms of
global governance, to minimize the role of the United Nations,
to undermine multilateral institutions, to promote unilateralism
and the consecration of the market, and to impose the will of
the powerful to decide the future of mankind.
The president of Socialist International, Antonio Guterres,
former socialist prime minister of Portugal, said the "Bush
administration was impeding efforts to establish a new world
order," according to the Denver Post (Oct. 30, p. 21A).
Specifically, the socialists want the new Economic Security
Council to be a "Council for Sustainable Development that
would coordinate sustainable development on a global scale ..."
and, to implement the Kyoto Protocol.
Socialists want to consolidate the U.N. Environment Program, and
all the existing environmental treaties, under the enforcement
authority of a new World Environment Organization, the same
function the Commission on Global Governance proposed for the
outdated U.N. Trusteeship Council.
This document also endorses: the U.N. Millennium Development
goals adopted in 2000; the U.N.'s Monterey Consensus, adopted in
2002; and the U.N.'s Plan for Sustainable Development, adopted
in Johannesburg in 2002. It calls for the elimination of
agricultural subsidies in the U.S., Europe and Japan, and free
exportation by developing countries into these markets, and
international control of " ... regulation, accountability and
supervision of financial systems to enhance the prospects for
sustainable growth and development."
Socialist International links "exacerbated nationalism ... and
xenophobic attitudes," with terrorism, as "threats to peace,"
which must be addressed only by an expanded U.N. Security
Council, with the authority and means "to act to preserve and
enforce peace," which "must be carried out in accordance with
the decisions of the United Nations."
The [Socialist] International, therefore, believes that reform
of the United Nations cannot be delayed any longer and will
continue to be strongly engaged in the process. Achieving
lasting peace and security requires that the United Nations
Charter be updated to meet today's new challenges, and that the
Security Council be reformed to make it more representative,
democratic and responsive.
The "reform" called for by the U.N.'s Commission on Global
Governance, and by the U.N., would expand the Security Council
in number, whose members would serve rotating terms, remove the
"Permanent Member" status from the U.S., France, England,
Germany and China, and would eliminate the veto power of any
single nation.
The socialists want the U.N. to place "greater emphasis on the
provision of global public services, especially with regard to
sanitation, health care, child-care facilities, education,
employment promotion and environmental protection."
In a clear statement of support for the socialist model of
economic organization, rather than the capitalist model, the
document says:
The principle of public service cannot be sacrificed to the
consecration of the market. Tax systems should also be adapted
to promote better public services and a new global tax should be
created to fund the global public goods.
The "new global tax" endorsed by this statement is discussed at
length throughout U.N. literature and is a series of taxing
proposals ranging from a tax on international currency
transactions (the Tobin Tax), to a tax on resource use, and use
of the "global commons," which includes the air, space, oceans
and the airwaves used for radio, television and Internet
transmissions.
This global taxing authority was included in the first draft of
the recommendations of the U.N.'s High Level Panel on Financing
Development, meeting in Monterey, Mexico, in 2001. It was
removed, at the insistence of the new U.S. delegates, appointed
by the Bush administration. The panel remains in place, however,
to seek independent financing of U.N. operations.
Socialist International is the world's largest political
organization, according to its website, working through more
than 140 national organizations. Its largest affiliate in the
United States is the Democratic Socialists of America, which
says it is "building progressive movements for social change
while establishing an openly socialist presence in American
communities and politics."
The "social change" described here is the global governance
agenda developed jointly, and now publicly advanced by both the
United Nations, and the Socialist International.
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low