Discussion:
No justice here
(too old to reply)
Tony
2019-12-29 19:01:36 UTC
Permalink
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
Rich80105
2019-12-29 19:59:07 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later ïncident"sowed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
John Bowes
2019-12-29 20:30:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later ďncident"sowed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
Lay off the cooking sherry Rich! Just because it's red doesn't mean it's good for you :)
Tony
2019-12-29 20:51:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later ïncident"sowed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Rich80105
2019-12-29 22:24:30 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Tony
2019-12-29 22:46:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Labour hid the truth, the complainant has not had justice. Fact.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was, just read it again, It is in English.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
You are the spinner, liar and defamer. Not the article.
Crash
2019-12-30 04:26:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was. Under the photo of Nigel Hawthorne, there is a tag line
of:
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019

So the article reflects the situation as of a few days ago.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
How does anyone complaint to the Police about Labour not learning from
its mistakes (as portrayed by the article)?


--
Crash McBash
Tony
2020-01-07 03:28:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Crash
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was. Under the photo of Nigel Hawthorne, there is a tag line
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019
So the article reflects the situation as of a few days ago.
I would really like to see Rich accept that he occasionally does not play fair
- I doubt I will see that here.
Post by Crash
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
How does anyone complaint to the Police about Labour not learning from
its mistakes (as portrayed by the article)?
--
Crash McBash
John Bowes
2019-12-31 03:22:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
You're mistaking Paula for your glorious leader Rich. Sure Bennet lies but Jacinda is the Queen of lies! Though have to admit you're the King of lies Rich :)
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Lie! You did read the article didn't you Rich?
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
That should have been done from the very beginning rather than leaving it to Winston's leader to arrange the cover up!
Tony
2020-01-08 01:36:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Rich80105
2020-01-08 03:27:24 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or dop you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Tony
2020-01-08 03:35:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or dop you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Rich80105
2020-01-08 08:26:32 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:35:46 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or dop you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't

Yes the article was written in September, but it was not updated the
day before that exchange of posts. The statement about two issues was
therefore wrong, even though the first part was correct.

Try reading posts from other people, Tony, and gicving a bit more
thought before making false accusations.
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Tony
2020-01-08 19:30:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:35:46 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or dop you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't
Yes the article was written in September, but it was not updated the
day before that exchange of posts. The statement about two issues was
therefore wrong, even though the first part was correct.
Try reading posts from other people, Tony, and gicving a bit more
thought before making false accusations.
The article had this under the photograph.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019
So you were wrong and now you are lying.
You cannot deny that.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Rich80105
2020-01-08 20:52:55 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:30:41 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:35:46 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or do you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't
Yes the article was written in September, but it was not updated the
day before that exchange of posts. The statement about two issues was
therefore wrong, even though the first part was correct.
Try reading posts from other people, Tony, and gicving a bit more
thought before making false accusations.
The article had this under the photograph.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019
So you were wrong and now you are lying.
You cannot deny that.
Yes it was republished - and there was a claim that it had been
updated, but there did not appear to be any change from the original
article. If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Tony
2020-01-09 00:08:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:30:41 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:35:46 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or do you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't
Yes the article was written in September, but it was not updated the
day before that exchange of posts. The statement about two issues was
therefore wrong, even though the first part was correct.
Try reading posts from other people, Tony, and gicving a bit more
thought before making false accusations.
The article had this under the photograph.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019
So you were wrong and now you are lying.
You cannot deny that.
Yes it was republished - and there was a claim that it had been
updated, but there did not appear to be any change from the original
article. If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
Maybe you cannot read but more importantly you lied.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
John Bowes
2020-01-10 00:49:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:30:41 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:35:46 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:36:54 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:51:52 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:01:36 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/09/10/798729/labour-fails-to-learn-from-its-mistakes
So Labour threw the compainant "to the wolves".
No Tony, this is an article written a long time ago. The then
President of Labour was replaced, and a later "incident" showed that
Labour had indeed learned from the experience.
That is a barefaced lie. Labour have not learned from the experience.
Yes they did. The biggest thing we have lerned is that Paula Bennet
lies, and then lies, and then lies . . .
Post by Tony
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't.
Yes it was as Crash has explained.
You don't have to agree with it but acknowledging that it is in fact a recently
updated article is a reasonable thing to do.
I freely cknowledge that the article was re-published, but dispute
that it was updated - or do you count re-publication as being an
"update"? If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
You said it wasn't written recently and wasn't updated.
You were wrong.
The article was written in September which is not long ago and was updated
yesterday.
No it wasn't
Yes the article was written in September, but it was not updated the
day before that exchange of posts. The statement about two issues was
therefore wrong, even though the first part was correct.
Try reading posts from other people, Tony, and gicving a bit more
thought before making false accusations.
The article had this under the photograph.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2019
Updated December 29, 2019
So you were wrong and now you are lying.
You cannot deny that.
Yes it was republished - and there was a claim that it had been
updated, but there did not appear to be any change from the original
article. If there were any changes or additions to the article I
did not see them and no-one has identified any change.
Maybe you cannot read but more importantly you lied.
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by Tony
More spin, It was a disgraceful episode and justice was not done.
Yes the article was spin. But if you are upset about something that
was not right, make a complaint to the police!
Rich is incapable of comprehending anything except his last lie Tony. Point out the obvious to Rich is like washing your car during a dust storm: a waste of time!
Loading...