Post by Tony
20 years is in line with many other countries but surely a staggered
implementation would be fair.
I read the article and thought, in every other introduction of change it is
a gradual thing. GST to age one get superannuation, lowering of
drinking/voting age. So what is different here?
It is a NZ First’s, Mark Patterson, production which might explain it. I see
that both National and Labour think that it is a bit harsh. So why can they
not get together and say gradual it is Mark. Got it?