Discussion:
Keith Warren abuses with impunity
Add Reply
Tony
2020-04-19 06:39:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -

"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

And he claims there is no abuse.

Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.

Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.

And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
Rich80105
2020-04-19 10:57:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 01:39:53 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
I wondered why are you posting all this again, Tony. Clearly you have
made an impact on nz.general; any suggestion that your posts fall
un-noticed thugh teh group are clearly refutes by the reactions you
have carefuly colleced with pride. Perhaps you could get them printed
in a large enough font to beeasily readable - and printed on A2 or
even A1 for a poster to remind you that you are a person of some
importance - you get noticed, and people take not of your writings.
You deserve to be proud of this post, Tony; treasure the moment.
Tony
2020-04-19 20:50:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 01:39:53 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
I wondered why are you posting all this again, Tony. Clearly you have
made an impact on nz.general; any suggestion that your posts fall
un-noticed thugh teh group are clearly refutes by the reactions you
have carefuly colleced with pride. Perhaps you could get them printed
in a large enough font to beeasily readable - and printed on A2 or
even A1 for a poster to remind you that you are a person of some
importance - you get noticed, and people take not of your writings.
You deserve to be proud of this post, Tony; treasure the moment.
Your sarcasm is to the fore again.
Thank you for clearly supporting abuse in this newsgroup. I already believed
that you did so but now you have given that proof. Mr. Warren clearly wrote
that what he was writing was not abusive, and that is plain wrong.
Your agreement that abuse is OK is noted and will be also be noted by all who
read your sartcasm.
Rich80105
2020-04-19 22:15:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:50:03 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 01:39:53 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
I wondered why are you posting all this again, Tony. Clearly you have
made an impact on nz.general; any suggestion that your posts fall
un-noticed thugh teh group are clearly refutes by the reactions you
have carefuly colleced with pride. Perhaps you could get them printed
in a large enough font to be easily readable - and printed on A2 or
even A1 for a poster to remind you that you are a person of some
importance - you get noticed, and people take not of your writings.
You deserve to be proud of this post, Tony; treasure the moment.
Your sarcasm is to the fore again.
Thank you for clearly supporting abuse in this newsgroup. I already believed
that what he was writing was not abusive, and that is plain wrong.
Your agreement that abuse is OK is noted and will be also be noted by all who
read your sartcasm.
I merely responded to a post from you - you clearly felt it worth
repeating . . .
Tony
2020-04-19 22:24:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:50:03 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 01:39:53 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
I wondered why are you posting all this again, Tony. Clearly you have
made an impact on nz.general; any suggestion that your posts fall
un-noticed thugh teh group are clearly refutes by the reactions you
have carefuly colleced with pride. Perhaps you could get them printed
in a large enough font to be easily readable - and printed on A2 or
even A1 for a poster to remind you that you are a person of some
importance - you get noticed, and people take not of your writings.
You deserve to be proud of this post, Tony; treasure the moment.
Your sarcasm is to the fore again.
Thank you for clearly supporting abuse in this newsgroup. I already believed
that what he was writing was not abusive, and that is plain wrong.
Your agreement that abuse is OK is noted and will be also be noted by all who
read your sartcasm.
I merely responded to a post from you - you clearly felt it worth
repeating . . .
You attacked me with sarcasm because of an entirely factual post of mine. You
are condoning abuse by not condemning abuse by others.
Tony
2020-04-19 23:48:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

and

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Rich80105
2020-04-20 03:25:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.

I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Tony
2020-04-20 04:27:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
Rich80105
2020-04-20 04:37:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
Tony
2020-04-20 04:58:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Rich80105
2020-04-20 05:05:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
Tony
2020-04-20 05:38:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably
set
your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working
brain,
you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn
brainlessness
is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
No you are incapable of honesty.
All an honest person would do is condemn abuse. But you will not, ever. And
that says volumes about your integrity.
Rich80105
2020-04-20 07:26:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:38:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably
set
your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working
brain,
you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn
brainlessness
is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
No you are incapable of honesty.
All an honest person would do is condemn abuse. But you will not, ever. And
that says volumes about your integrity.
Tony, I condemn your abuse of other posters to nz.general, and I am
sad that you do not recognise that you are doing it, even when your
objectionable behaviour has been pointed out to you by others.

Happy now?
Tony
2020-04-20 20:57:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:38:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them
with
your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal
standards
worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little
fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably
set
your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working
brain,
you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn
brainlessness
is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so
I
thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try
to
find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down
in
that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
No you are incapable of honesty.
All an honest person would do is condemn abuse. But you will not, ever. And
that says volumes about your integrity.
Much worse than your pitiful attempt at humour you are actively condoning and
deliberately supporting the abuse by James Christophers aka Keith Warren. You
are a disgrace and totally incapable of fair play or honesty.
Rich80105
2020-04-20 21:42:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:57:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:38:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them
with
your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal
standards
worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little
fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably
set
your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working
brain,
you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn
brainlessness
is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so
I
thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try
to
find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down
in
that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
No you are incapable of honesty.
All an honest person would do is condemn abuse. But you will not, ever. And
that says volumes about your integrity.
Much worse than your pitiful attempt at humour you are actively condoning and
deliberately supporting the abuse by James Christophers aka Keith Warren. You
are a disgrace and totally incapable of fair play or honesty.
Tony, Ihad already responded to your previous request that I condemn
abuse. That message was posted to nz.general, but addressed to you in
particular. Now you are choosing not to respond directly, but to send
further abuse. I appreciate that you are expecting, perhaps even
hoping, that I will respond in kind, but that has been shown to be
ineffective in the past. There is a simple concept that may help you,
Tony -treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself. Try it,
you may like the results.
Tony
2020-04-20 21:48:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:57:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:38:27 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:20 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:27:01 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:48:57 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days.
it
is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
So here we are -
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them
with
your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know
it,
you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too
graphically
in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal
standards
worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little
fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably
set
your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working
brain,
you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn
brainlessness
is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so
I
thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
And he claims there is no abuse.
Clearly the ravings of a sociopath. Help is available.
Anybody who abuses like this and denies that he/she is abusive has a
mental
disorder. He/she is not merely sociopathic but also rather dumb.
And yet there is at least one person here who actively defends and even
supports his behaviour. Shame on you too.
And yet more
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try
to
find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down
in
that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
and
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
Tony, you have been a champion of your own opinions, justifying the
lack of any supporting facts by stating that you are entitled to your
opinion. Yet here you are apparently objecting to opinions which are
no more forcefully expressed than your own, but which, unlike your
opinions, relate directly to the subject of the thread and to the
posts you have written. They are therefore in terms of the conditions
you set for yourself, both justifiable and on topic. I appreciate that
you often express authoritarian views, but this is not just an
inconsistent policy you are espousing, but it does make you appear
hypocritical.
I suggest you reflect on what it is in your posts that prompts strong
reactions, and if you do not like opinions of others, endeavour to set
a better example yourself of reasoned, polite and well supported
argument and views. in your discourses with the poster James
Christophers, I see you receiving better consideration and helpful
advice than you give to others.
Everything you have written here is an attempt to distort the truth of this
thread.
Mr. Warren is an abusive man and you are condoning his abuse.
It is entirely up to you as to whether you are able to curb your
robust and forcefully expressed opinions which at times prompt
similarly robust and forcefully expressed opinions from others. To put
it in terms you may recognise in these difficult times, let us be kind
to others.
I am always kind to others.
You condone abuse within this newsgroup until such time that you finally react
to the abusive nature of one of our less than welcome participants, and
admonish that behaviour.
Until then your silence condones and supports his behaviour.
Silence? I have posted directly above your latest contribution to this
thread - are you expectting audio? James Christophers appears to
react to your posts rather than initiate differences of opinion, Tony.
The solution is in your hands . . .
No you are incapable of honesty.
All an honest person would do is condemn abuse. But you will not, ever. And
that says volumes about your integrity.
Much worse than your pitiful attempt at humour you are actively condoning and
deliberately supporting the abuse by James Christophers aka Keith Warren. You
are a disgrace and totally incapable of fair play or honesty.
Tony, Ihad already responded to your previous request that I condemn
abuse. That message was posted to nz.general, but addressed to you in
particular. Now you are choosing not to respond directly, but to send
further abuse. I appreciate that you are expecting, perhaps even
hoping, that I will respond in kind, but that has been shown to be
ineffective in the past. There is a simple concept that may help you,
Tony -treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself. Try it,
you may like the results.
You appalling liar, you have been the worst abuser here for years and always,
yes always the first to do so.
You did not responsd so here you go again.
Why are you defending someone (Keith Warren and his 'nyms) for his abuse?
Why Rich?
Answer or be labelled as what you are - a single minded, abusive liar.
Gordon
2020-04-20 05:07:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
Dan C where are you?
Rich80105
2020-04-20 05:16:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Gordon
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
Dan C where are you?
This one?


or this one?


Thanks for improving the thread!
Tony
2020-04-20 05:35:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by Gordon
Post by Tony
The following is the verbatim abuse he has posted over the past few days. it is
only a fraction of his posts over the past few months that were abusive.
Dan C where are you?
This one?
http://youtu.be/hjAjxrracPE
or this one?
http://youtu.be/p9lPnOJWpqw
Thanks for improving the thread!
Can't ever be honest, can you.
The thread is about abuse on-line and you can only retreat into sarcasm and
innuendo.
How you can live with your petty dishonesty is a mystery to the entire
univerese.
Tony
2020-04-21 00:38:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Keith Warren aka James Whatchamacallit posted all of the following and claims
he is not abusive.
What a strange life he leads.

"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."

"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
Rich80105
2020-04-21 01:42:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Keith Warren aka James Whatchamacallit posted all of the following and claims
he is not abusive.
What a strange life he leads.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
I don't think you are any closer to getting a wall poster, Tony. Is
lockdown getting to you?
Tony
2020-04-21 02:11:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Keith Warren aka James Whatchamacallit posted all of the following and claims
he is not abusive.
What a strange life he leads.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
I don't think you are any closer to getting a wall poster, Tony. Is
lockdown getting to you?
So Rich doesn't abuse? Well he just did!
It is now proven that you support abuse in this newsgroup and indeed that you
are now participating in what you appear to believe is a sport.
I passionatyely hope that you have never reproduced.
Rich80105
2020-04-21 09:05:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:11:30 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Keith Warren aka James Whatchamacallit posted all of the following and claims
he is not abusive.
What a strange life he leads.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
I don't think you are any closer to getting a wall poster, Tony. Is
lockdown getting to you?
So Rich doesn't abuse? Well he just did!
It is now proven that you support abuse in this newsgroup and indeed that you
are now participating in what you appear to believe is a sport.
I passionatyely hope that you have never reproduced.
I am very sorry if you are unwell, Tony. No I do not see your posting
quotations from other posts as a sport; but I admit I still do not
understand why you do.
Tony
2020-04-21 20:37:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:11:30 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Keith Warren aka James Whatchamacallit posted all of the following and claims
he is not abusive.
What a strange life he leads.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
I don't think you are any closer to getting a wall poster, Tony. Is
lockdown getting to you?
So Rich doesn't abuse? Well he just did!
It is now proven that you support abuse in this newsgroup and indeed that you
are now participating in what you appear to believe is a sport.
I passionatyely hope that you have never reproduced.
I am very sorry if you are unwell, Tony. No I do not see your posting
quotations from other posts as a sport; but I admit I still do not
understand why you do.
You are so chiuldish - sarcasm and all. It is you that sees it as a sport.
So may I assume that my passionate hope is true - that you have never
reproduced?
Antoon Akkedis
2020-04-21 08:16:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
(snip)

Rich,

It is best not to reply to those posts.

The original post has all the appeal of a farting contest. By replying,
you are giving it an air of normalcy which it does not deserve.
Sam
2020-04-21 21:19:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:16:34 +1200, Antoon Akkedis
Post by Antoon Akkedis
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
(snip)
Rich,
It is best not to reply to those posts.
The original post has all the appeal of a farting contest. By replying,
you are giving it an air of normalcy which it does not deserve.
Good morning James
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Tony
2020-04-21 21:52:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sam
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:16:34 +1200, Antoon Akkedis
Post by Antoon Akkedis
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:38:56 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
(snip)
Rich,
It is best not to reply to those posts.
The original post has all the appeal of a farting contest. By replying,
you are giving it an air of normalcy which it does not deserve.
Good morning James
Well done Sam, Got it in one.
Tony
2020-04-23 07:39:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Just an update to the latest abuse by the troll Keith Warren, aka James
thingumajig, aka WillyWonka or similar, aka Antoon Akkedis (for not the first
time) and no doubt many other 'nyms
It is a mystery to me why such a childish person can concentrate long enough to
actually remember the last false name he used - ah, of course, sociopathy
explains it.

"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."

"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"

"Should Rich ever ""upset" me, then it will be the first time he does so. He
clearly upsets you, though, but be honest for once: isn't this because people
and the world in general are not so morally bankrupt as you that they would
kneel to your grizzling, nappy-rash petulance and absent self-esteem?"

"Your irredeemable schoolyard crassness is exceeded only by your insistently
megaphoned futility.

So to you goes every plaudit. Well done, indeed!

As I've said of you before which only too tellingly you have never dared deny,
you are both fake and faker, evidenced by the ineluctable fact that you have
neither the education nor the diligence, nor even the basic character and moral
integrity to do other than lie, dissemble, impugn and divert solely because you
plainly did nothing else but during your totally wasted formative years.

This is exactly why the BBC fired you within weeks of your having joined it.
Simply, you were found out in short order and evicted by your betters.

And you know it."
Tony
2020-04-27 01:51:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Just an update to the latest abuse by the troll Keith Warren, aka James
thingumajig, aka WillyWonka or similar, aka Antoon Akkedis (for not the first
time) and no doubt many other 'nyms
It is a mystery to me why such a childish person can concentrate long enough to
actually remember the last false name he used - ah, of course, sociopathy
explains it.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."
"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."
"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"
"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."
"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"
"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."
"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"
"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."
"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"
"So keep on diggin', turkey!"
"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."
"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."
"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"
"Should Rich ever ""upset" me, then it will be the first time he does so. He
clearly upsets you, though, but be honest for once: isn't this because people
and the world in general are not so morally bankrupt as you that they would
kneel to your grizzling, nappy-rash petulance and absent self-esteem?"
"Your irredeemable schoolyard crassness is exceeded only by your insistently
megaphoned futility.
So to you goes every plaudit. Well done, indeed!
As I've said of you before which only too tellingly you have never dared deny,
you are both fake and faker, evidenced by the ineluctable fact that you have
neither the education nor the diligence, nor even the basic character and moral
integrity to do other than lie, dissemble, impugn and divert solely because you
plainly did nothing else but during your totally wasted formative years.
This is exactly why the BBC fired you within weeks of your having joined it.
Simply, you were found out in short order and evicted by your betters.
And you know it."
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."

"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"

"Should Rich ever ""upset" me, then it will be the first time he does so. He
clearly upsets you, though, but be honest for once: isn't this because people
and the world in general are not so morally bankrupt as you that they would
kneel to your grizzling, nappy-rash petulance and absent self-esteem?"

"Your irredeemable schoolyard crassness is exceeded only by your insistently
megaphoned futility.

So to you goes every plaudit. Well done, indeed!

As I've said of you before which only too tellingly you have never dared deny,
you are both fake and faker, evidenced by the ineluctable fact that you have
neither the education nor the diligence, nor even the basic character and moral
integrity to do other than lie, dissemble, impugn and divert solely because you
plainly did nothing else but during your totally wasted formative years.

This is exactly why the BBC fired you within weeks of your having joined it.
Simply, you were found out in short order and evicted by your betters.

And you know it."

"By your own words are you nothing other than a gratuitous contriver and
dissembler of the most noxious kind.
Shame on you and the only thing about you: your rank, bottomless dishonesty."

"That's just another of Tony's idiotic attempts at a must-fail rebuttal from a
must-fail dissembler."

"You are the very personification of "distraction". Had you the born wit you'd
have woken up to this before you were 5 years-old or someone your senior had
slapped you around until you did. That said, you then wouldn't have squandered
your entire lifetime making such a confounded mess of whatever pauce social
skills you might possibly been blessed with."

"Solely because it baits your every hair-trigger sensibility. In fact you go
looking for it. Worse still, you can't get enough of it because it so indulges
your vaulting, contrarian narcissism."
Tony
2020-04-27 02:53:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
He gets worse by the minute. What a loser.

"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."

"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"

"Should Rich ever ""upset" me, then it will be the first time he does so. He
clearly upsets you, though, but be honest for once: isn't this because people
and the world in general are not so morally bankrupt as you that they would
kneel to your grizzling, nappy-rash petulance and absent self-esteem?"

"Your irredeemable schoolyard crassness is exceeded only by your insistently
megaphoned futility.

So to you goes every plaudit. Well done, indeed!

As I've said of you before which only too tellingly you have never dared deny,
you are both fake and faker, evidenced by the ineluctable fact that you have
neither the education nor the diligence, nor even the basic character and moral
integrity to do other than lie, dissemble, impugn and divert solely because you
plainly did nothing else but during your totally wasted formative years.

This is exactly why the BBC fired you within weeks of your having joined it.
Simply, you were found out in short order and evicted by your betters.

And you know it."

"By your own words are you nothing other than a gratuitous contriver and
dissembler of the most noxious kind.
Shame on you and the only thing about you: your rank, bottomless dishonesty."

"That's just another of Tony's idiotic attempts at a must-fail rebuttal from a
must-fail dissembler."

"You are the very personification of "distraction". Had you the born wit you'd
have woken up to this before you were 5 years-old or someone your senior had
slapped you around until you did. That said, you then wouldn't have squandered
your entire lifetime making such a confounded mess of whatever pauce social
skills you might possibly been blessed with."

"Solely because it baits your every hair-trigger sensibility. In fact you go
looking for it. Worse still, you can't get enough of it because it so indulges
your vaulting, contrarian narcissism."

"in all your fast-encroaching madness,
continue to babble as you progress nicely down that slippery slope to the funny
farm..."

"...you wish, you snobby little half-wit lower-middle-class inbred of the first
water..."

"you repellent little slug..."

"And you, you terminally rancid Little Englander, are simply that
self-annointed
dingleberry dangling from beneath the anus of the world!"

"?What prouder distinction could any half-wit Pom ever wish for, eh?"

"Go stuff your head up your own anus and thereby gain the widest perspective on
life you have ever been favoured with."
Tony
2020-04-29 03:21:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
He gets worse by the minute. What a loser.
What a childish man.
"You see, your dwarfish, tinpot diktats to others for not keeping rigidly
on-topic seem somehow not to apply to you who so freely breach them with your
hypocritical, sanctimonious claptrap."

"IOW, no abuse of any description to be seen or read and you know it, you
shameless, thieving, half-crazed Usenet spammer."

"So why aren't you above being so easily persuaded to allow your immature
yah-boo compulsions to get the better of you?"

"Equally obvious to any observer of both your reply and your boorish
self-serving Usenet persona, that you and personal bias are too graphically in
lockstep to be convincingly denied."

"Whereas you have proved time and again that you have personal standards worthy
of nothing but scorn, ridicule and rebuke, you hypocritical little fourth-form
weasel - with your 70% Latin pass an' all!"

"Over the past several days and extending way back, you have provably set your
own disgracefully self-debasing standards below that of the depth of the
Mariana Trench."

"Can there be no ending to your crassly megaphoned shame?"

"There is no kind of abuse or weaponry deployed. Had you a working brain, you'd
know it takes only the merest click of the keyboard to turn your lying,
impugning, self-debasing rhetoric back on you. Such inborn brainlessness is
what makes you so frustrated at your own incompetence and ineptitude in
conveying your overstretched braincell processes coherently."

"Did you but know it, you're already sweetly sucking up the inevitable
consequences of your own singularly palpable un-self-awareness, and so I thank
you courteously for the entertainment!"

"So keep on diggin', turkey!"

"So just for once do yourself and the rest of Usenet a favour and try to find
at
least just one small crumb of intellectual honesty somewhere deep down in that
mental rat's nest you have the gall to call a conscience."

"And you'll be well advised also to cease an desist forthwith from behaving
like
some demented gumshoe stalking every avenue of Usenet to push your unhinged
vexatiousness on others solely and wholly for the specious and perverse
gratification it so plainly gives you."

"Can there be no ending to your self-flagellating fetish for
mendacity and misrepresentation?"

"Should Rich ever ""upset" me, then it will be the first time he does so. He
clearly upsets you, though, but be honest for once: isn't this because people
and the world in general are not so morally bankrupt as you that they would
kneel to your grizzling, nappy-rash petulance and absent self-esteem?"

"Your irredeemable schoolyard crassness is exceeded only by your insistently
megaphoned futility.

So to you goes every plaudit. Well done, indeed!

As I've said of you before which only too tellingly you have never dared deny,
you are both fake and faker, evidenced by the ineluctable fact that you have
neither the education nor the diligence, nor even the basic character and moral
integrity to do other than lie, dissemble, impugn and divert solely because you
plainly did nothing else but during your totally wasted formative years.

This is exactly why the BBC fired you within weeks of your having joined it.
Simply, you were found out in short order and evicted by your betters.

And you know it."

"By your own words are you nothing other than a gratuitous contriver and
dissembler of the most noxious kind.
Shame on you and the only thing about you: your rank, bottomless dishonesty."

"That's just another of Tony's idiotic attempts at a must-fail rebuttal from a
must-fail dissembler."

"You are the very personification of "distraction". Had you the born wit you'd
have woken up to this before you were 5 years-old or someone your senior had
slapped you around until you did. That said, you then wouldn't have squandered
your entire lifetime making such a confounded mess of whatever pauce social
skills you might possibly been blessed with."

"Solely because it baits your every hair-trigger sensibility. In fact you go
looking for it. Worse still, you can't get enough of it because it so indulges
your vaulting, contrarian narcissism."

"in all your fast-encroaching madness,
continue to babble as you progress nicely down that slippery slope to the funny
farm..."

"...you wish, you snobby little half-wit lower-middle-class inbred of the first
water..."

"you repellent little slug..."

"And you, you terminally rancid Little Englander, are simply that
self-annointed
dingleberry dangling from beneath the anus of the world!"

"?What prouder distinction could any half-wit Pom ever wish for, eh?"

"Go stuff your head up your own anus and thereby gain the widest perspective on
life you have ever been favoured with."

"blithering self-unaware idiot whose clappermouth has long since outgrown his
one
fast-failing brain cell.

"rank poseur that you are!"

Loading...