Discussion:
Simple Simon on Seven, National on 29.
Add Reply
m***@gmail.com
2020-05-01 05:49:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
George
2020-05-01 20:26:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
Ah and which polling company is it that does all labors polls?
Just asking
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Rich80105
2020-05-01 21:20:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by George
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
Ah and which polling company is it that does all labors polls?
Just asking
A good question, George. I suspect it would be really hard to find
out; if knowing how skilled and knowledgeable you are we realise that
you couldn't find out, but the Aussies do keep such information fairly
close. Back here in New Zealand, we do know that Simon wisely keeps
all information about polling for National close to his chest, but
could it be Curia that does the polling for Labour?

Its a hard one, George, and if you couldn't find out I despair of us
ever finding the answer. Thank goodness we can rely on good old Simon,
right, George?
Tony
2020-05-01 23:27:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
Ah and which polling company is it that does all labors polls?
Just asking
A good question, George. I suspect it would be really hard to find
out; if knowing how skilled and knowledgeable you are we realise that
you couldn't find out, but the Aussies do keep such information fairly
close. Back here in New Zealand, we do know that Simon wisely keeps
all information about polling for National close to his chest, but
could it be Curia that does the polling for Labour?
Its a hard one, George, and if you couldn't find out I despair of us
ever finding the answer. Thank goodness we can rely on good old Simon,
right, George?
Sarcastic prick - Geroge just keep ignoring the idiot.
John Bowes
2020-05-04 06:53:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
Ah and which polling company is it that does all labors polls?
Just asking
A good question, George. I suspect it would be really hard to find
out; if knowing how skilled and knowledgeable you are we realise that
you couldn't find out, but the Aussies do keep such information fairly
close. Back here in New Zealand, we do know that Simon wisely keeps
all information about polling for National close to his chest, but
could it be Curia that does the polling for Labour?
Its a hard one, George, and if you couldn't find out I despair of us
ever finding the answer. Thank goodness we can rely on good old Simon,
right, George?
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much like so many of your posts Rich :)
George
2020-05-04 20:12:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
:)
Poke the village idiot and watch the crap overflow..
To deny the obvious so blatantly
Not the brightest candle in the pack
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Tony
2020-05-04 20:43:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
:)
Poke the village idiot and watch the crap overflow..
To deny the obvious so blatantly
Not the brightest candle in the pack
Yes just more sarcasm in an attempt to hide the obvious.
Rich80105
2020-05-04 22:28:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
Post by George
:)
Poke the village idiot and watch the crap overflow..
Well it was your question that filled the toilet, George, others in
the pack are simply simple followers . . .
Post by George
To deny the obvious so blatantly
Not the brightest candle in the pack
Tony
2020-05-04 22:31:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
:)
Poke the village idiot and watch the crap overflow..
Well it was your question that filled the toilet, George, others in
the pack are simply simple followers . . .
Post by George
To deny the obvious so blatantly
Not the brightest candle in the pack
James Christophers
2020-05-05 00:29:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
"As we all know" is to speak for others, a presumptuousness too far.

Sarcasm may be interpreted as abuse by those who must needs go looking for abuse.

Otherwise it may be interpreted as provocation slyly aimed at the looking-for-hurt suggestible who must needs seek and find offence wherever and whenever he, listens, reads or looks.

One writer puts it this way:

"Doggedly literal-minded people just don't get it. So sarcasm either confuses them or makes them feel stupid. (And, really, that's part of its fiendishly clever design.)" A narrow, limited view, but OK for all that.

Intelligent, well-formed minds handle sarcasm with aplomb. Sufficiently quick-witted people know how to score off it, whereas the slow-witted and the intransigent feel aggrieved at their own lack of mental alacrity and agility and so act as one would expect.
Tony
2020-05-05 00:33:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
James Christophers
2020-05-05 01:16:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Whether or not your direct and boorishly vulgar response to Rich's previous post receives the civilised grace you may foolishly think it merits, is for you alone to anticipate.
Tony
2020-05-05 01:23:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Rich80105
2020-05-05 02:12:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
Tony
2020-05-05 02:43:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of
abuse
when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
You tell me why he (Keith aka James aka several others) is so abusive.
James Christophers
2020-05-05 03:39:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
That's two in a row, too!

However, your questioning of Tony Norunk's behaviour towards you is not just fair but put with all the good grace that the tragically self-unaware Tony himself lacks.

So on this occasion it's all kudos to you, Rich.

Incidentally, since the thread has been diverted towards sarcasm, you may well find it worth asking Tony Norunk to justify his frequent use of "Yeah right!" to express his skepticism at the doings of his self-evident betters, the term "Yeah right!" being 100% sarcasm in its own right.

Kindly come back when Tony Norunk has given what you consider a satisfactory answer.
Rich80105
2020-05-05 03:47:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by James Christophers
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
That's two in a row, too!
However, your questioning of Tony Norunk's behaviour towards you is not just fair but put with all the good grace that the tragically self-unaware Tony himself lacks.
So on this occasion it's all kudos to you, Rich.
Incidentally, since the thread has been diverted towards sarcasm, you may well find it worth asking Tony Norunk to justify his frequent use of "Yeah right!" to express his skepticism at the doings of his self-evident betters, the term "Yeah right!" being 100% sarcasm in its own right.
Kindly come back when Tony Norunk has given what you consider a satisfactory answer.
That's fair. But he won't do that. I think he likes me.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Rich80105
2020-05-05 04:54:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by James Christophers
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse
when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
That's two in a row, too!
However, your questioning of Tony Norunk's behaviour towards you is not just fair but put with all the good grace that the tragically self-unaware Tony himself lacks.
So on this occasion it's all kudos to you, Rich.
Incidentally, since the thread has been diverted towards sarcasm, you may well find it worth asking Tony Norunk to justify his frequent use of "Yeah right!" to express his skepticism at the doings of his self-evident betters, the term "Yeah right!" being 100% sarcasm in its own right.
Kindly come back when Tony Norunk has given what you consider a satisfactory answer.
That's fair. But he won't do that. I think he likes me.
More desperation and pique leading to forgery - I did not write the
response above.
Rich80105
2020-05-05 05:25:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by Rich80105
Post by James Christophers
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse
when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
That's two in a row, too!
However, your questioning of Tony Norunk's behaviour towards you is not just fair but put with all the good grace that the tragically self-unaware Tony himself lacks.
So on this occasion it's all kudos to you, Rich.
Incidentally, since the thread has been diverted towards sarcasm, you may well find it worth asking Tony Norunk to justify his frequent use of "Yeah right!" to express his skepticism at the doings of his self-evident betters, the term "Yeah right!" being 100% sarcasm in its own right.
Kindly come back when Tony Norunk has given what you consider a satisfactory answer.
That's fair. But he won't do that. I think he likes me.
More desperation and pique leading to forgery - I did not write the
response above.
Or may be I did, who knows.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Rich80105
2020-05-05 05:28:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Rich80105
Post by Rich80105
Post by James Christophers
Post by Rich80105
On Mon, 04 May 2020 20:23:33 -0500, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Tony
Post by Rich80105
Post by George
On Sun, 3 May 2020 23:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Post by John Bowes
A rhetorical question designed to highlight your stupidity Rich! You
suggest Curia do Labours polls while we all know it's UMR who tend to
give results that don't come within a bulls roar of reality. Much
like so many of your posts Rich :)
Instead it just highlighted your inability to engage in civilised
discussion - my response was designed to highlight the stupidity of
the question.
What nonsense, you were sarcastic which as we all know is a form of abuse
when
overused.
Intelligent, well formed minds know that you are full of shit.
Your vular and abusive postings for as far back as we can go are for you to
relish (because you are a sociopath and therefore proud of them) are legendary.
Why so abusive, Tony?
That's two in a row, too!
However, your questioning of Tony Norunk's behaviour towards you is not just fair but put with all the good grace that the tragically self-unaware Tony himself lacks.
So on this occasion it's all kudos to you, Rich.
Incidentally, since the thread has been diverted towards sarcasm, you may well find it worth asking Tony Norunk to justify his frequent use of "Yeah right!" to express his skepticism at the doings of his self-evident betters, the term "Yeah right!" being 100% sarcasm in its own right.
Kindly come back when Tony Norunk has given what you consider a satisfactory answer.
That's fair. But he won't do that. I think he likes me.
More desperation and pique leading to forgery - I did not write the
response above.
Really, dont think so
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Mutlley
2020-05-01 21:35:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
They've let you out of the asylum again. Time to add you to my block
filter again.
Tony
2020-05-01 23:28:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mutlley
Post by m***@gmail.com
https://thestandard.org.nz/umrs-bombshell-poll-result/
They've let you out of the asylum again. Time to add you to my block
filter again.
Yes looks like it, warmongering fool that he is.
Loading...