Discussion:
Another post for Rich to ignore
Add Reply
Tony
2020-04-30 21:17:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Fact - Keith Warren pos(t)ing as James Christophers has spewed very nasty abuse
aimed mainly but not exclusively at me.
Fact - Rich posted saying that the comments that I took offence at were mild.
Rich has cosistently refued to address this despite me posting those abuses so
that he could not disagree that they were extreme, he is doing what he always
does. He is running away and bellowing lies as he goes.
Rich is also a person who abuses those who have the temerity to disagree with
him. He does so in many ways but sarcasm is his favourite weapon followed by
lies and worse.
Rich is a coward, and a defamer and all who read his sewage should be very
cautious about believing that what he posts is the truth.
The fact of the matter is that Rich hates people to have freedoms like speech,
the right to earn money through commerce and the right to criticise an
incompetent government (like the current one).
James Christophers
2020-04-30 23:45:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
Fact - Keith Warren pos(t)ing as James Christophers has spewed very nasty abuse
aimed mainly but not exclusively at me.
No abuse. Merely incisive observations of one whose hilarious stumblings down the Via Dolorosa of his own making provide an inexhaustible fund of mirth for all to enjoy.
Post by Tony
Fact - Rich posted saying that the comments that I took offence at were mild.
That was Rich's opinion, nothing more. And he has a perfect right to express that opinion whether you like it or not. Or would you be so arrogant as to deny him that right? Yes or No?
Post by Tony
Rich has cosistently refued to address this despite me posting those abuses so
that he could not disagree that they were extreme, he is doing what he always
does. He is running away and bellowing lies as he goes.
He has every right to refuse. Just because you pose what you stupidly believe is a challenge does not, ipso facto, make it imperative that your challenge shall be met. In any case, who gave you the Devine right to insist that others should take orders from you, you ridiculous little nincompoop?

Nope, you're frustrated that others in particular and the world in general don't think and act the way you in your absurdly childish naïveté think they should.
Post by Tony
Rich is also a person who abuses those who have the temerity to disagree with
him. He does so in many ways but sarcasm is his favourite weapon followed by
lies and worse.
Then why, as one so uniquely distinguished by your lower-middle-class 70% Latin pass an' all, have you so dismally failed to moderate his behaviour?
Post by Tony
Rich is a coward, and a defamer and all who read his sewage should be very
cautious about believing that what he posts is the truth.
How do your postings significantly differ from his in this respect?
Post by Tony
The fact of the matter is that Rich hates people to have freedoms like speech,
When did Rich ever attempt to censor or interdict the numberless unhinged noises of yours that you so wantonly throw around nz general; or censor or interdict rational commentary from others for that matter?
Post by Tony
the right to earn money through commerce...
When did Rich ever once say that you have no right to earn money through commerce?
Post by Tony
and the right to criticise an
incompetent government (like the current one).
When has Rich ever once even hinted, let alone said, that you should be deprived of your right to criticise any government of whatever stripe?
Tony
2020-05-01 00:20:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
All Keith Warren nonsense removed.
James Christophers
2020-05-01 04:58:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Tony
All Keith Warren nonsense removed.
By all means delete it from your computer, but as is always the case it remains both on mine and in the google archive.

You persistently say that others should conform to your own self-serving strictures on what you would perversely call "debate", yet you consistently fail to meet your own same strictures. Such arrogant self-unawareness is one of the principal character flaws of the classic narcissist, being deaf to everyone and everything but his own opinions, however warped and unversed, and his necessarily fragile ego.

This is why virtually every one of your topics fails to conclude satisfactorily and to your advantage. They simply collapse of their own accord under the burden of your own intellectual laziness and contrarian intransigence.

When positing a polemic - which as a contrarian, by definition, you can't help but do - it's a good idea to use noting but facts initially to support it. It is also wise to hold sufficient fact-based researches - not opinions - as ammo in reserve to maintain and reinforce your position as need be.

You consistently fail on these two accounts alone. You therefore must fail. Every time.

This is why, when trumped, you have no recourse other than to resort to dissimulation and then, when called on that (doubtless in salty terms, and why not?), turn sour and resentful. You end up making of yourself an incompetent Aunt Sally, an object of ridicule and derision.

The remedies are simple, clear and present, even to you.

Now you know, so shape up or ship out.
Tony
2020-05-01 05:02:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
More abuse removed. Keith is on time today, probably started on his favourite
nip about an hour ago and just warming up pending collapse and catatonia for
the rest of the evening.
John Bowes
2020-05-01 05:48:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by James Christophers
Post by Tony
Fact - Keith Warren pos(t)ing as James Christophers has spewed very nasty abuse
aimed mainly but not exclusively at me.
No abuse. Merely incisive observations of one whose hilarious stumblings down the Via Dolorosa of his own making provide an inexhaustible fund of mirth for all to enjoy.
Post by Tony
Fact - Rich posted saying that the comments that I took offence at were mild.
That was Rich's opinion, nothing more. And he has a perfect right to express that opinion whether you like it or not. Or would you be so arrogant as to deny him that right? Yes or No?
Post by Tony
Rich has cosistently refued to address this despite me posting those abuses so
that he could not disagree that they were extreme, he is doing what he always
does. He is running away and bellowing lies as he goes.
He has every right to refuse. Just because you pose what you stupidly believe is a challenge does not, ipso facto, make it imperative that your challenge shall be met. In any case, who gave you the Devine right to insist that others should take orders from you, you ridiculous little nincompoop?
Nope, you're frustrated that others in particular and the world in general don't think and act the way you in your absurdly childish naïveté think they should.
Post by Tony
Rich is also a person who abuses those who have the temerity to disagree with
him. He does so in many ways but sarcasm is his favourite weapon followed by
lies and worse.
Then why, as one so uniquely distinguished by your lower-middle-class 70% Latin pass an' all, have you so dismally failed to moderate his behaviour?
Post by Tony
Rich is a coward, and a defamer and all who read his sewage should be very
cautious about believing that what he posts is the truth.
How do your postings significantly differ from his in this respect?
Post by Tony
The fact of the matter is that Rich hates people to have freedoms like speech,
When did Rich ever attempt to censor or interdict the numberless unhinged noises of yours that you so wantonly throw around nz general; or censor or interdict rational commentary from others for that matter?
Post by Tony
the right to earn money through commerce...
When did Rich ever once say that you have no right to earn money through commerce?
Post by Tony
and the right to criticise an
incompetent government (like the current one).
When has Rich ever once even hinted, let alone said, that you should be deprived of your right to criticise any government of whatever stripe?
Typical shit from an ex RNVR golden rivet polisher...

Loading...