On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:57:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
Post by John Bowes
Seems Labour was at fault in Hutt South in that it should have declared the huge profit it was making from the rent fiddle!
so once again Rich's accusation of me lying is in reality just another lie from the ever more useless fucking imbecile Rich :)
It sound more like sloppy recordkeeping. From previous articles it
seems the Party owned the whole building - they sold it to another
entity (a Union) subject to a lease to the party, probably at a fixed
lease cost. All normal commercial dealings, but over time the fixed
lease cost has become a benefit; which was probably reflected in a
lower purchase price for the union. Sanctity of contract is all very
well, but it is necessary at times to actually have the documentation
. . . So no lying, nothing dishonest, no donations, just poor
record-keeping. Unless they get it sorted, they will have to report
some "donations" - does that really matter to anyone?