Post by James ChristophersPost by TonyPost by Rich80105On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:16:53 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by TonyPost by James ChristophersPost by TonyPost by Rich80105Post by GordonOn Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:56:30 -0600, Tony <lizandtony at orcon dot net
Post by Tony- provided we listen and stop panicking.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41748-017-0020-z
Who is panicking?
Both sides and you. That is why you can not see it.
Both sides of what (or should that be who?) You are correct, I do not
see any panic.
Of course you don't, but that doesn't mean there is none.
The 'inconcludable negative', the 'reasoning' behind which was once expanded
A: Suppose you came downstairs one morning for a greenstrainer and found an
elephant in the larder?
B: But there is no elephant in the larder.
A: That's because they're hiding. (Note the sly use of the plural to
intensify the 'reasoning'.)
B: I see. So where are they hiding, then? Tell me that!
A: Well....they must be hiding somewhere, otherwise how could they have
they
got away with it for so long?
(The Goon Show - Spike Milligan)
Surreal, I know, but it is this same kind of 'reasoning' - or very close
to
it
- that underpins "classically educated" Boris Johnson's piffle-waffle strawman
approach to debate when cornered. Blatant in-yer-face intellectual dishonesty.
You may be correct, and you may well be discussing yourself.
More gratuitous presumptuousness from you - the ingrained conceits of an
arrogant nincompoop lost for argument up there in lights. No "supporting
evidence" of this needed either since my reply is plainly self-validating.
Stated with no evidence whatsoever and with plenty of arrogant authoritarian
hatred for me because of some trivial slight in the past. Grow up you silly old
man.
Post by James ChristophersSo you say while closing your ears and eyes to the fact that it serves as a
salutary reminder to you of your own silliness, which is precisely why I cited
it in the first place. Fact is, the substance of what I gave has everything to
do with what you wrote, and you you know cannot possibly show otherwise.
No it does not and you cannot possibly show that it does; It for you to provide
evidence not for me to prove otherwise. You have failed once more.
Post by James ChristophersâWeâ. There you go yet again with yet another gratuitous and unverifiable
presumption.
Just as you have without pause in this thread.
Post by James ChristophersPost by TonyPost by Rich80105James Christophers is correct and you know it Tony.
Quite so.
James Christophers has almost never been correct, merely a poseur, entrenched
in his silly pretence at being someone with that born name and whose real
persona is a proven inverted snob (a particularly revolting self-delusionary
creature).
Post by James ChristophersPost by TonyPost by Rich80105To express an
opinion is legitimate, but it is polite and good practice to identify
your comment as such. To assert a fact is also not unreasonable at
times, but when asked politely to give support for your statement it
is dishonest to respond with obfuscation and abuse - your posts
represent classic troll behaviour, Tony.
No they don't but yoours do.
OK, then - prove yours is not" classic troll behaviour".
No, you prove it is. I do not need to prove that your slur is wrong, it is for
you to demonstrate that you have evidence of that stupid suggestion.
Post by James ChristophersPost by TonyYou have just provided an opinion with zero evidence...
Name, exactly, that evidence you seek, but has been absent prior to "Rich's" post?
I don't have to tell you what evidence you should provide. Just provide
evidence or shut up, that is your task as the accuser or supporter of the
accuser. I will not defer to your childish inability to find evidence of
something that is obviously born from an abusive natiure.
Post by James ChristophersPost by TonyPost by Rich80105just what you accuse me of ad nausium. (sic - 70% Lain pass, an' all!)
Your Latin score? With your inverted snobbery and inability to avoid being
offensive to any and all that you look down on for being better than you! Yes
that is all you are, an inverted snob. Your ancestors were, I have no doubt,
wonderful hard working people so why have you let them down in such an idiotic
way? Eh Keith?
Lain (sic) pass?
Gooses and gander eh Keith? Talk about nausea eh Keith?